Model Comparison

Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

Claude Sonnet 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Cost data unavailable.

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
Input tokens$0.00
Output tokens$0.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude Sonnet 4.5 specifies output context (64,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Input200,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Apr 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B does not.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 4.5 was released on 2025-09-29, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B was released on 2025-01-20.

Claude Sonnet 4.5 is 8 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Sep 29, 2025

6 months ago

8mo newer
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

Jan 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Sonnet 4.5 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Claude Sonnet 4.5's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B's cutoff date.

Claude Sonnet 4.5

Jan 2025

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (83.4% vs 49.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

Claude Sonnet 4.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is made by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 scores MMMLU: 89.1%, AIME 2025: 87.0%, TAU-bench Retail: 86.2%, GPQA: 83.4%, MMMUval: 77.8%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B scores MATH-500: 92.8%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 49.1%, LiveCodeBench: 37.6%.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is developed by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B is developed by DeepSeek.