The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.7

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.7 are closely matched at 51.5 and 47.6 on the LLM Stats Score. Grok 4.7 is 1.3x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.7 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 51.5 and 47.6.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Sonnet 5.5 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Grok 4.7 is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Sonnet 5.5

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Grok 4.7

  • cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
51.5
#12
47.6
#28
49.7
#16
36.8
#79
42.6
#7
39.3
#16
39.3
#9
35.0
#22
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$2.00 / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$6.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
500,000

Individual benchmarks

8 reported for Claude Sonnet 5.5 · 23 for Grok 4.7

3 shared

Claude Sonnet 5.5 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AA-Briefcase v1.1, CursorBench 4.0, Terminal-Bench 4.0), while Grok 4.7 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Grok 4.7 costs less

For input processing, Claude Sonnet 5.5 ($2.00/1M tokens) costs the same as Grok 4.7 ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Sonnet 5.5 ($10.00/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Grok 4.7 ($6.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude Sonnet 5.5 is more expensive than Grok 4.7.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerAnthropic
xAI
Grok 4.7
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$6.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Grok 4.7's 500,000 tokens. Only Claude Sonnet 5.5 specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok 4.7
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.7 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 5.5 was released on 2026-09-28, while Grok 4.7 was released on 2026-09-21.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is 0 month newer than Grok 4.7.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Sep 28, 2026

-1 days ago

1w newer
Grok 4.7

Sep 21, 2026

6 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Both models have the same knowledge cutoff date of 2026-06-01.

They should have similar awareness of historical events and information up to this date.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

Jun 2026

Grok 4.7

Jun 2026

Provider Availability

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Grok 4.7 is available from xAI.

Claude Sonnet 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Grok 4.7

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.7 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Sonnet 5.5
✓ Preferred
Grok 4.7
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs Grok 4.7.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 5.5 or Grok 4.7?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.7 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 51.5 and 47.6. Claude Sonnet 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Grok 4.7 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Sonnet 5.5 compare to Grok 4.7 in benchmarks?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 80.1%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 70.6%, Humanity's Last Exam (with tools): 64.5%, Chartography (no tools): 61.6%, GDPval-AA 2.1: 61.5%. Grok 4.7 scores BixBench MCQ: 88.4%, WMDP-Bio: 88.1%, WMDP-Cyber: 88.1%, WMDP-Chem: 84.9%, CyberGym: 80.3%.

Is Claude Sonnet 5.5 cheaper than Grok 4.7?

Both models cost $2.00 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.7?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Grok 4.7 supports 500K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.7?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.5 vs 47.6), context window (1.0M vs 500K). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Grok 4.7?

Claude Sonnet 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI.