The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched at 48.5 and 45.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

xAI · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 48.5 and 45.7.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok 4.7 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Grok 4.7

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Grok 4.7
xAI
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.5
#22
45.7
#29
Reasoning
37.4
#68
43.2
#42
Coding
40.1
#13
36.6
#21
Agents
36.3
#18
33.3
#25
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$6.00 / M
— / M
Context window
500,000
—

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for Grok 4.7 · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

3 shared

Grok 4.7 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0), while MiMo-V2.6-Flash is better at 1 benchmark (CyberGym).

Grok 4.7 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4.7 specifies input context (500,000 tokens).

xAI
Grok 4.7
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Grok 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Grok 4.7 is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Grok 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Grok 4.7 was released on 2026-09-21, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 0 month newer than Grok 4.7.

Grok 4.7

Sep 21, 2026

0 days ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.7 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.7's training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date.

Grok 4.7

May 2026

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Grok 4.7
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Grok 4.7 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 48.5 and 45.7. Grok 4.7 is made by xAI and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Grok 4.7 compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Grok 4.7 scores BixBench MCQ: 88.4%, WMDP-Bio: 88.1%, WMDP-Cyber: 88.1%, WMDP-Chem: 84.9%, CyberGym: 80.3%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Grok 4.7 supports 500K tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs 45.7), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Grok 4.7 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons