The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Sonnet 5 vs Hy3

Claude Sonnet 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 42.9.

Anthropic · Tencent · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Sonnet 5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 42.9, ranking #21 overall.

In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Sonnet 5 wins 7; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Sonnet 5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.5 and ranks #21 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 7 of 7 exact shared results

Choose Hy3

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
48.5
#21
42.9
#42
47.8
#20
43.0
#40
37.0
#17
32.8
#35
31.4
#24
26.6
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
7 of 7
0 of 7
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Claude Sonnet 5
Hy3
38.4#26
35.6#41
23.9#37
21.5#50
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for Claude Sonnet 5 · 31 for Hy3

7 shared

Claude Sonnet 5 outperforms in 7 benchmarks (ArXivMath, BrowseComp, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Pro, SWE-Bench Verified, Toolathlon, USAMO 2026), while Hy3 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Sonnet 5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude Sonnet 5 specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Claude Sonnet 5 specifies output context (64,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Tencent
Hy3
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude Sonnet 5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hy3 does not.

Claude Sonnet 5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude Sonnet 5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Hy3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude Sonnet 5 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Hy3 uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude Sonnet 5

Proprietary

Closed source

Hy3

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Sonnet 5 was released on 2026-06-30, while Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06.

Hy3 is 0 month newer than Claude Sonnet 5.

Claude Sonnet 5

Jun 30, 2026

2 months ago

Hy3

Jul 6, 2026

2 months ago

6d newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Sonnet 5 and Hy3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Sonnet 5
✓ Preferred
Hy3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Sonnet 5 vs Hy3.

Which is better, Claude Sonnet 5 or Hy3?

Claude Sonnet 5 leads the LLM Stats Score 48.5 to 42.9. Claude Sonnet 5 is made by Anthropic and Hy3 is made by Tencent. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Sonnet 5 compare to Hy3 in benchmarks?

Claude Sonnet 5 scores CharXiv-R: 88.3%, ChartMuseum: 86.7%, SWE-Bench Verified: 85.2%, BrowseComp: 84.7%, GDP.pdf: 81.6%. Hy3 scores DeepSearchQA: 91.0%, GPQA: 90.4%, IMO-AnswerBench: 90.0%, BrowseComp: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 79.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Sonnet 5 and Hy3?

Claude Sonnet 5 supports 1.0M tokens and Hy3 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Sonnet 5 and Hy3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.5 vs 42.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Sonnet 5 and Hy3?

Claude Sonnet 5 is developed by Anthropic and Hy3 is developed by Tencent.