Hy3 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Hy3 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched at 43.2 and 43.3 on the LLM Stats Score. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2.8x cheaper per token.
Tencent · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Hy3 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 43.2 and 43.3.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 2.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Hy3
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 2.8x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
31 reported for Hy3 · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Hy3 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is better at 1 benchmark (APEX-Agents).
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Hy3 ($0.14/1M tokens) is 2.3x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).
For output processing, Hy3 ($0.58/1M tokens) is 3.2x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Hy3 is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Hy3 has 171.0B more parameters than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin, making it 137.9% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 262,144 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 262,144 tokens.
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Hy3 was released on 2026-07-06, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2 months newer than Hy3.
Jul 6, 2026
2 months ago
Sep 3, 2026
6 days ago
1mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Hy3 is available from DeepInfra. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.
Hy3
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Hy3 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Hy3 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.