The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Codestral-22B vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 0.2.

Mistral AI · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 0.2, ranking #156 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Codestral-22B

  • you are already invested in the Mistral AI ecosystem

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
0.2
#309
24.0
#156
Reasoning
0.1
#303
21.8
#165
Coding
2.5
#213
9.6
#159
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Codestral-22B · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 30B

No common benchmarks found

Codestral-22B and IBM Granite 4.2 30Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

7.8B diff

IBM Granite 4.2 30B has 7.8B more parameters than Codestral-22B, making it 35.1% larger.

Mistral AI
Codestral-22B
22.2Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
22.2B
Codestral-22B
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B

License

Usage and distribution terms

Codestral-22B is licensed under MNPL-0.1, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Codestral-22B

MNPL-0.1

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Codestral-22B was released on 2024-05-29, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 27 months newer than Codestral-22B.

Codestral-22B

May 29, 2024

2.3 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

2.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Codestral-22B and IBM Granite 4.2 30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Codestral-22B
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Codestral-22B vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

Which is better, Codestral-22B or IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 0.2. Codestral-22B is made by Mistral AI and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Codestral-22B compare to IBM Granite 4.2 30B in benchmarks?

Codestral-22B scores HumanEvalFIM-Average: 91.6%, HumanEval: 81.1%, MBPP: 78.2%, Spider: 63.5%, HumanEval-Average: 61.5%. IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%.

What are the main differences between Codestral-22B and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (0.2 vs 24.0), licensing (MNPL-0.1 vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Codestral-22B and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Codestral-22B is developed by Mistral AI and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons