The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command A+ vs Gemini 3.8 Flash

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 50.6 to 24.0.

Cohere · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.6 to 24.0, ranking #16 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.8 Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command A+

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.6 and ranks #16 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Command A+
Cohere
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
24.0
#167
50.6
#16
Reasoning
21.5
#178
46.9
#24
Coding
7.3
#184
38.5
#15
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.75 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.75 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Command A+
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Vision
12.4#102
34.1#13
Multimodal
15.9#84
35.3#11
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Command A+ · 13 for Gemini 3.8 Flash

1 shared

Command A+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 3.8 Flash is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R).

Gemini 3.8 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Cohere
Command A+
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Command A+ and Gemini 3.8 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command A+ is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Gemini 3.8 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 4 months newer than Command A+.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

3 months ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

1 weeks ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Command A+'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Command A+'s cutoff date.

Command A+

—

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and Gemini 3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs Gemini 3.8 Flash.

Which is better, Command A+ or Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 50.6 to 24.0. Command A+ is made by Cohere and Gemini 3.8 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command A+ compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Command A+ and Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Command A+ supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command A+ and Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 50.6), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command A+ and Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and Gemini 3.8 Flash is developed by Google.

Related comparisons