The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber are closely matched at 51.8 and 42.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 51.8 and 42.7.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.8
#11
42.7
#44
Coding
41.3
#10
36.1
#25
Agents
36.9
#13
31.7
#25
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.75 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.8 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Gemini 3.8 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2026-09-02.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 51.8 and 42.7. Gemini 3.8 Flash is made by Google and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.8 vs 42.7), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons