The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command R+ vs IBM Granite 4.2 3B

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to -0.1.

Cohere · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.6 to -0.1, ranking #213 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command R+

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 3B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.6 and ranks #213 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.1
#310
15.6
#213
-0.4
#306
12.0
#234
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Command R+
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
-1.7#297
13.7#216
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Command R+ · 13 for IBM Granite 4.2 3B

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.2 3Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

101.0B diff

Command R+ has 101.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 3B, making it 3366.7% larger.

Cohere
Command R+
104.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
3.0Bparameters
104.0B
Command R+
3.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while IBM Granite 4.2 3B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 3B is 24 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

2.0 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 3B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

2.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.2 3B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 3B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs IBM Granite 4.2 3B.

Which is better, Command R+ or IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

IBM Granite 4.2 3B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.6 to -0.1. Command R+ is made by Cohere and IBM Granite 4.2 3B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command R+ compare to IBM Granite 4.2 3B in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. IBM Granite 4.2 3B scores AIME 2025: 78.3%, IFBench: 74.3%, LiveCodeBench v6: 69.7%, MMLU-Pro: 67.8%, RULER 64k: 67.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and IBM Granite 4.2 3B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.1 vs 15.6), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and IBM Granite 4.2 3B?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and IBM Granite 4.2 3B is developed by IBM.