Model Comparison

Command R+ vs Grok-2Which is better in 2026?

Grok-2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is 9.1x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Command R+ vs Grok-2 — which is better?

Command R+ (by Cohere) and Grok-2 (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-2 is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU). Grok-2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Command R+ is roughly 9.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Command R+ if…

  • cost matters — it's about 9.1x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok-2 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Command R+ outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-2 is better at 1 benchmark (MMLU).

Grok-2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Command R+ costs less

For input processing, Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens) is 8.0x cheaper than Grok-2 ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x cheaper than Grok-2 ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-2 is more expensive than Command R+.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Cohere
Command R+
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerCohere
xAI
Grok-2
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Command R+ can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok-2 is limited to 8,000 tokens.

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-2
Input128,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Sat Jun 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Grok-2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Command R+ does not.

Grok-2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Command R+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Grok-2 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Grok-2

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Grok-2 was released on 2024-08-13.

Command R+ is 1 month newer than Grok-2.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.8 years ago

2w newer
Grok-2

Aug 13, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock. Grok-2 is available from xAI.

Command R+

cohere logo
Cohere
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Grok-2

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher MMLU score (87.5% vs 75.7%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Cohere
Command R+
xAI
Grok-2

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Grok-2.

Which is better, Command R+ or Grok-2?

Grok-2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Grok-2 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Command R+ compare to Grok-2 in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Grok-2 scores DocVQA: 93.6%, HumanEval: 88.4%, MMLU: 87.5%, MATH: 76.1%, MMLU-Pro: 75.5%.

Is Command R+ cheaper than Grok-2?

Command R+ is 8.0x cheaper for input tokens. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere. Grok-2 costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Grok-2?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Grok-2 supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Grok-2?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.25 vs $2.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Grok-2?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Grok-2 is developed by xAI.