The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command R+ vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.7 to -0.1.

Cohere · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.7 to -0.1, ranking #44 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command R+

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.7 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Command R+
Cohere
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-0.1
#313
42.7
#44
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.00 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Command R+ · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

No common benchmarks found

Command R+ and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Command R+ specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Command R+ specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Cohere
Command R+
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command R+ is licensed under CC BY-NC, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 24 months newer than Command R+.

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

2.0 years ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

2.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command R+ and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command R+
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command R+ vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, Command R+ or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.7 to -0.1. Command R+ is made by Cohere and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command R+ compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Command R+ and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Command R+ supports 128K tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command R+ and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.1 vs 42.7), licensing (CC BY-NC vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command R+ and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Command R+ is developed by Cohere and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google.

Related comparisons