The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs GLM-5.3

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is 2.4x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Zhipu AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GLM-5.3 is better at 1 benchmark (Humanity's Last Exam). GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, DeepSeek-R1-0528 is roughly 2.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GLM-5.3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-R1-0528

  • cost matters — it's about 2.4x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GLM-5.3

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
GLM-5.3
Zhipu AI
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.50 / M
$1.40 / M
Output price
$2.15 / M
$4.40 / M
Context window
131,072
1,000,000
Released
May 2025
Aug 2026
License
MIT
Unknown

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

DeepSeek-R1-0528 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GLM-5.3 is better at 1 benchmark (Humanity's Last Exam).

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-R1-0528 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.8x cheaper than GLM-5.3 ($1.40/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-R1-0528 ($2.15/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than GLM-5.3 ($4.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GLM-5.3 is more expensive than DeepSeek-R1-0528.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$2.15
Best providerDeepinfra
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input tokens$1.40
Output tokens$4.40
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

82.0B diff

GLM-5.3 has 82.0B more parameters than DeepSeek-R1-0528, making it 12.2% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
671.0Bparameters
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
753.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1-0528
753.0B
GLM-5.3

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GLM-5.3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-R1-0528's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-R1-0528 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GLM-5.3 is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.3
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-R1-0528 was released on 2025-05-28, while GLM-5.3 was released on 2026-08-14.

GLM-5.3 is 15 months newer than DeepSeek-R1-0528.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

May 28, 2025

1.2 years ago

GLM-5.3

Aug 14, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is available from DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita. GLM-5.3 is available from ZAI.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.15/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.70/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M

GLM-5.3

z logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $1.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-R1-0528 and GLM-5.3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-R1-0528
✓ Preferred
GLM-5.3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs GLM-5.3.

Which is better, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or GLM-5.3?

GLM-5.3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is made by DeepSeek and GLM-5.3 is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does DeepSeek-R1-0528 compare to GLM-5.3 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.4%, SimpleQA: 92.3%, AIME 2024: 91.4%, AIME 2025: 87.5%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%. GLM-5.3 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.2%, CyberGym: 84.5%, FrontierSWE: 78.1%, Toolathlon: 73.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 66.9%.

Is DeepSeek-R1-0528 cheaper than GLM-5.3?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is 2.8x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-R1-0528 costs $0.50/M input and $2.15/M output via deepinfra. GLM-5.3 costs $1.40/M input and $4.40/M output via z.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-R1-0528 and GLM-5.3?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports 131K tokens and GLM-5.3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-R1-0528 and GLM-5.3?

Key differences include context window (131K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.50 vs $1.40/M), licensing (MIT vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-R1-0528 and GLM-5.3?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is developed by DeepSeek and GLM-5.3 is developed by Zhipu AI.

Related comparisons