The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2

DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 are closely matched at 24.1 and 18.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.1 and 18.4.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-R1-0528 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-R1-0528

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Nano 9B v2

  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.1
#167
18.4
#211
23.7
#163
17.2
#210
7.7
#184
14.4
#133
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$2.15 / M
— / M
Context window
163,840

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
26.2#104
16.4#205
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for DeepSeek-R1-0528 · 6 for Nemotron Nano 9B v2

3 shared

DeepSeek-R1-0528 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-R1-0528 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

662.1B diff

DeepSeek-R1-0528 has 662.1B more parameters than Nemotron Nano 9B v2, making it 7439.3% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
671.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
8.9Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1-0528
8.9B
Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-R1-0528 specifies input context (163,840 tokens). Only DeepSeek-R1-0528 specifies output context (163,840 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-R1-0528 was released on 2025-05-28, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 was released on 2025-08-18.

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is 3 months newer than DeepSeek-R1-0528.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

May 28, 2025

1.3 years ago

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Aug 18, 2025

1.1 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-09-01, while DeepSeek-R1-0528's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron Nano 9B v2's training data extends to 2024-09-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-R1-0528's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Sep 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-R1-0528
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2.

Which is better, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 24.1 and 18.4. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is made by DeepSeek and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-R1-0528 compare to Nemotron Nano 9B v2 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.4%, SimpleQA: 92.3%, AIME 2024: 91.4%, AIME 2025: 87.5%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 scores MATH-500: 97.8%, IFEval: 90.3%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 71.1%, BFCL_v3_MultiTurn: 66.9%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports 164K tokens and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.1 vs 18.4), licensing (MIT vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is developed by DeepSeek and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is developed by NVIDIA.