The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 18.4.

InclusionAI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 18.4, ranking #44 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.0 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Nemotron Nano 9B v2

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.0
#44
18.4
#211
Reasoning
44.2
#35
17.2
#210
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.06 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144
—

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin · 6 for Nemotron Nano 9B v2

No common benchmarks found

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron Nano 9B v2don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

115.1B diff

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin has 115.1B more parameters than Nemotron Nano 9B v2, making it 1293.3% larger.

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
124.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
8.9Bparameters
124.0B
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
8.9B
Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03, while Nemotron Nano 9B v2 was released on 2025-08-18.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 13 months newer than Nemotron Nano 9B v2.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.0yr newer
Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Aug 18, 2025

1.1 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron Nano 9B v2 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-09-01, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron Nano 9B v2's training data extends to 2024-09-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

—

Nemotron Nano 9B v2

Sep 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Nano 9B v2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Nemotron Nano 9B v2.

Which is better, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 18.4. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ling 3.0 Flash Fin compare to Nemotron Nano 9B v2 in benchmarks?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%. Nemotron Nano 9B v2 scores MATH-500: 97.8%, IFEval: 90.3%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 71.1%, BFCL_v3_MultiTurn: 66.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.0 vs 18.4), licensing (Unknown vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ling 3.0 Flash Fin and Nemotron Nano 9B v2?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI and Nemotron Nano 9B v2 is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons