The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Sarvam-105B

DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Sarvam-105B are closely matched at 24.1 and 25.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Sarvam AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Sarvam-105B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.1 and 25.7.

In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Sarvam-105B wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-R1-0528

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.50/M input and $2.15/M output

Choose Sarvam-105B

  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 7 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.1
#166
25.7
#152
23.7
#162
26.2
#147
7.7
#183
-1.6
#247
-11.9
#183
5.6
#144
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 7
4 of 7
Input price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$2.15 / M
— / M
Context window
163,840

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Sarvam-105B
26.2#104
29.1#88
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for DeepSeek-R1-0528 · 14 for Sarvam-105B

7 shared

DeepSeek-R1-0528 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MMLU-Pro), while Sarvam-105B is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2025, BrowseComp, HMMT 2025, SWE-Bench Verified).

Sarvam-105B has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

566.0B diff

DeepSeek-R1-0528 has 566.0B more parameters than Sarvam-105B, making it 539.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
671.0Bparameters
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
105.0Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1-0528
105.0B
Sarvam-105B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-R1-0528 specifies input context (163,840 tokens). Only DeepSeek-R1-0528 specifies output context (163,840 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528
Input163,840 tokens
Output163,840 tokens
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-105B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is licensed under MIT, while Sarvam-105B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

MIT

Open weights

Sarvam-105B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-R1-0528 was released on 2025-05-28, while Sarvam-105B was released on 2026-03-06.

Sarvam-105B is 9 months newer than DeepSeek-R1-0528.

DeepSeek-R1-0528

May 28, 2025

1.3 years ago

Sarvam-105B

Mar 6, 2026

6 months ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Sarvam-105B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-R1-0528
✓ Preferred
Sarvam-105B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-R1-0528 vs Sarvam-105B.

Which is better, DeepSeek-R1-0528 or Sarvam-105B?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Sarvam-105B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 24.1 and 25.7. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is made by DeepSeek and Sarvam-105B is made by Sarvam AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-R1-0528 compare to Sarvam-105B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 scores MMLU-Redux: 93.4%, SimpleQA: 92.3%, AIME 2024: 91.4%, AIME 2025: 87.5%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%. Sarvam-105B scores MATH-500: 98.6%, AIME 2025: 96.7%, MMLU: 90.6%, HMMT 2025: 85.8%, HMMT25: 85.8%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Sarvam-105B?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 supports 164K tokens and Sarvam-105B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Sarvam-105B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.1 vs 25.7), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-R1-0528 and Sarvam-105B?

DeepSeek-R1-0528 is developed by DeepSeek and Sarvam-105B is developed by Sarvam AI.