The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Muse Spark Open

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 14.1. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is 11.4x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark Open leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 14.1, ranking #43 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Spark Open wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is roughly 11.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark Open also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

  • cost matters — it's about 11.4x cheaper per token

Choose Muse Spark Open

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.9 and ranks #43 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
14.1
#259
44.9
#43
14.4
#252
45.2
#39
8.5
#200
33.0
#42
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.10 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$0.40 / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
128,000
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Muse Spark Open
16.4#215
31.6#69
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B · 17 for Muse Spark Open

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Muse Spark Open is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Muse Spark Open significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.10/1M tokens) is 12.5x cheaper than Muse Spark Open ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B ($0.40/1M tokens) is 10.6x cheaper than Muse Spark Open ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark Open is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

745.4B diff

Muse Spark Open has 745.4B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B, making it 1055.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
70.6Bparameters
Meta
Muse Spark Open
816.0Bparameters
70.6B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
816.0B
Muse Spark Open

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark Open accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B's 128,000 tokens. Muse Spark Open can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Muse Spark Open supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B does not.

Muse Spark Open can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark Open

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is licensed under MIT, while Muse Spark Open uses Muse Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

MIT

Open weights

Muse Spark Open

Muse Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B was released on 2025-01-20, while Muse Spark Open was released on 2026-10-15.

Muse Spark Open is 21 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

Muse Spark Open

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is available from DeepInfra. Muse Spark Open is available from Together.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M

Muse Spark Open

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Muse Spark Open side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark Open
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B vs Muse Spark Open.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B or Muse Spark Open?

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 14.1. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is made by DeepSeek and Muse Spark Open is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B compare to Muse Spark Open in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B scores MATH-500: 94.5%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 65.2%, LiveCodeBench: 57.5%. Muse Spark Open scores MCP Atlas: 89.2%, GPQA: 89.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.4%, BabyVision: 80.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 76.4%.

Is DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B cheaper than Muse Spark Open?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is 12.5x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra. Muse Spark Open costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Muse Spark Open?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B supports 128K tokens and Muse Spark Open supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Muse Spark Open?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (14.1 vs 44.9), context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.10 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Muse Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B and Muse Spark Open?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 70B is developed by DeepSeek and Muse Spark Open is developed by Meta.