The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 35.0. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 5.0x cheaper per token.

Meta · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Spark Open leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 35.0, ranking #43 overall.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Muse Spark Open wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is roughly 5.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Muse Spark Open also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Muse Spark Open

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.9 and ranks #43 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 5 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • cost matters — it's about 5.0x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Muse Spark Open
Meta
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
44.9
#43
35.0
#108
Reasoning
45.2
#39
36.2
#94
Coding
33.0
#42
21.0
#108
Agents
30.6
#43
16.5
#99
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 5
1 of 5
Input price
$1.25 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$4.25 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Muse Spark Open
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Math
31.6#69
28.1#101
Vision
31.2#34
20.3#86
Tool use
23.3#44
11.0#133
Multimodal
33.1#20
22.0#76
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

17 reported for Muse Spark Open · 19 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

5 shared

Muse Spark Open outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GDPval-AA, OSWorld-Verified, SciCode, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Muse Spark Open significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs less

For input processing, Muse Spark Open ($1.25/1M tokens) is 6.3x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Muse Spark Open ($4.25/1M tokens) is 4.3x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark Open is more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerTogether
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

696.0B diff

Muse Spark Open has 696.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B), making it 580.0% larger.

Meta
Muse Spark Open
816.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
120.0Bparameters
816.0B
Muse Spark Open
120.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Muse Spark Open accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. Muse Spark Open can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is limited to 262,144 tokens.

Meta
Muse Spark Open
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Muse Spark Open

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Muse Spark Open is licensed under Muse Model License, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Muse Spark Open

Muse Model License

Open weights

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2026-10-15.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Muse Spark Open

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Muse Spark Open is available from Together. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.

Muse Spark Open

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Muse Spark Open
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Muse Spark Open vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

Which is better, Muse Spark Open or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Muse Spark Open leads the LLM Stats Score 44.9 to 35.0. Muse Spark Open is made by Meta and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Muse Spark Open compare to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) in benchmarks?

Muse Spark Open scores MCP Atlas: 89.2%, GPQA: 89.0%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.4%, BabyVision: 80.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 76.4%. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%.

Is Muse Spark Open cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 6.3x cheaper for input tokens. Muse Spark Open costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via together. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs $0.20/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Muse Spark Open supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.9 vs 35.0), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($1.25 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Muse Model License vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Muse Spark Open and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Muse Spark Open is developed by Meta and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons