The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.7 to -2.7.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.7 to -2.7, ranking #44 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.7 and ranks #44 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
DeepSeek
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-2.7
#328
42.7
#44
Coding
-4.5
#248
36.1
#25
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is licensed under MIT, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

MIT

Open weights

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B was released on 2025-01-20, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 20 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

1.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.7 to -2.7. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is made by DeepSeek and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B scores MATH-500: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 52.7%, GPQA: 33.8%, LiveCodeBench: 16.9%. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-2.7 vs 42.7), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is developed by DeepSeek and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google.

Related comparisons