The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 10.9.

DeepSeek · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 10.9, ranking #15 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
DeepSeek
Ling 3.1 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
10.9
#276
51.0
#15
Reasoning
11.2
#272
47.5
#26
Coding
5.4
#212
38.8
#18
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Ling 3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

545.2B diff

Ling 3.1 Flash has 545.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B, making it 3683.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
14.8Bparameters
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
560.0Bparameters
14.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
560.0B
Ling 3.1 Flash

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B was released on 2025-01-20, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 21 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 10.9. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is made by DeepSeek and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B scores MATH-500: 93.9%, AIME 2024: 80.0%, GPQA: 59.1%, LiveCodeBench: 53.1%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (10.9 vs 51.0), licensing (MIT vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B and Ling 3.1 Flash?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 14B is developed by DeepSeek and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons