Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Comparing DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.12/1M tokens) is 2.3x cheaper than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale ($0.28/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.18/1M tokens) is 2.3x cheaper than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale ($0.42/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input tokens$0.12
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$0.42
Best providerDeepSeek
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

652.2B diff

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 652.2B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B, making it 1988.4% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32.8Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
685.0Bparameters
32.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
685.0B
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale accepts 131,072 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun May 10 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale was released on 2025-12-01.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is 11 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Dec 1, 2025

5 months ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is available from DeepInfra. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is available from DeepSeek.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.12/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.42/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
DeepSeek
Larger context window (131,072 tokens)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B (DeepSeek) and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale (DeepSeek) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores HMMT 2025: 99.2%, AIME 2025: 96.0%, CodeForces: 90.0%, t2-bench: 80.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.1%.

Is DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B cheaper than DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 2.3x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs $0.28/M input and $0.42/M output via deepseek.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale?

Key differences include context window (128K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.12 vs $0.28/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.