Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 25.5x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 2.5 Pro is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA).

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Apr 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.12/1M tokens) is 10.4x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B ($0.18/1M tokens) is 55.6x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro is more expensive than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Apr 12 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input tokens$0.12
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro is limited to 65,536 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sun Apr 12 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 2.5 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not.

Gemini 2.5 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while Gemini 2.5 Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is 4 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.2 years ago

Gemini 2.5 Pro

May 20, 2025

10 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B's cutoff date.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

—

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is available from DeepInfra. Gemini 2.5 Pro is available from Google.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.12/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

Gemini 2.5 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2024 score (92.0% vs 83.3%)
Higher GPQA score (83.0% vs 62.1%)
DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and Gemini 2.5 Pro is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores MRCR: 93.0%, AIME 2024: 92.0%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.6%, Video-MME: 84.8%, AIME 2025: 83.0%.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 10.4x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B costs $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via google.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (128K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.12 vs $1.25/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek and Gemini 2.5 Pro is developed by Google.