The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Gemini 4 Carbon

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 12.4.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 12.4, ranking #2 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 4 Carbon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.0 and ranks #2 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
Gemini 4 Carbon
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
12.4
#283
59.0
#2
Reasoning
12.8
#272
54.9
#5
Coding
8.0
#212
48.1
#3
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.12 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B · 16 for Gemini 4 Carbon

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemini 4 Carbondon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 4 Carbon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 4 Carbon supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not.

Gemini 4 Carbon can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 4 Carbon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while Gemini 4 Carbon uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Gemini 4 Carbon

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while Gemini 4 Carbon was released on 2026-10-28.

Gemini 4 Carbon is 22 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.8 years ago

Gemini 4 Carbon

Oct 28, 2026

1 days ago

1.8yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemini 4 Carbon side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
✓ Preferred
Gemini 4 Carbon
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Gemini 4 Carbon.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Gemini 4 Carbon?

Gemini 4 Carbon leads the LLM Stats Score 59.0 to 12.4. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and Gemini 4 Carbon is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to Gemini 4 Carbon in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. Gemini 4 Carbon scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 96.2%, WebDev Arena: 88.4%, SEC-bench Pro: 88.2%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemini 4 Carbon?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and Gemini 4 Carbon supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemini 4 Carbon?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (12.4 vs 59.0), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Gemini 4 Carbon?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek and Gemini 4 Carbon is developed by Google.

Related comparisons