The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 13.3.

DeepSeek · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 13.3, ranking #156 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.2 30B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.12/M input and $0.18/M output

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.0 and ranks #156 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
13.3
#231
24.0
#156
13.5
#223
21.8
#165
8.3
#170
9.6
#159
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.12 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
15.2#207
25.6#103
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 30B

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

IBM Granite 4.2 30B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.8B diff

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B has 2.8B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 30B, making it 9.3% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
32.8Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
32.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25.

IBM Granite 4.2 30B is 19 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

6 days ago

1.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and IBM Granite 4.2 30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

IBM Granite 4.2 30B leads the LLM Stats Score 24.0 to 13.3. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to IBM Granite 4.2 30B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.3 vs 24.0), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM.