The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Grok-1.5V

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.1 to -0.8.

DeepSeek · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.1 to -0.8, ranking #247 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.1 and ranks #247 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok-1.5V

  • you are already invested in the xAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
Grok-1.5V
xAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
13.1
#247
-0.8
#331
Reasoning
13.3
#236
-0.1
#318
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.12 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
128,000
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B · 7 for Grok-1.5V

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Grok-1.5Vdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
xAI
Grok-1.5V
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok-1.5V supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B does not.

Grok-1.5V can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-1.5V

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is licensed under MIT, while Grok-1.5V uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

MIT

Open weights

Grok-1.5V

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B was released on 2025-01-20, while Grok-1.5V was released on 2024-04-12.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is 9 months newer than Grok-1.5V.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

9mo newer
Grok-1.5V

Apr 12, 2024

2.4 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Grok-1.5V side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
✓ Preferred
Grok-1.5V
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B vs Grok-1.5V.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B or Grok-1.5V?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B leads the LLM Stats Score 13.1 to -0.8. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is made by DeepSeek and Grok-1.5V is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B compare to Grok-1.5V in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B scores MATH-500: 94.3%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 62.1%, LiveCodeBench: 57.2%. Grok-1.5V scores AI2D: 88.3%, DocVQA: 85.6%, TextVQA: 78.1%, ChartQA: 76.1%, RealWorldQA: 68.7%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Grok-1.5V?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B supports 128K tokens and Grok-1.5V supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Grok-1.5V?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.1 vs -0.8), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B and Grok-1.5V?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is developed by DeepSeek and Grok-1.5V is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons