The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B vs DeepSeek R1 Zero

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and DeepSeek R1 Zero are closely matched at 8.9 and 16.2 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and DeepSeek R1 Zero are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 8.9 and 16.2.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Zero wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

  • you are already invested in the DeepSeek ecosystem

Choose DeepSeek R1 Zero

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
8.9
#257
16.2
#205
9.2
#247
16.5
#197
2.1
#210
4.3
#194
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 4
4 of 4
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
DeepSeek R1 Zero
14.2#208
17.7#180
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B · 4 for DeepSeek R1 Zero

4 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek R1 Zero is better at 4 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, LiveCodeBench, MATH-500).

DeepSeek R1 Zero significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

663.4B diff

DeepSeek R1 Zero has 663.4B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B, making it 8705.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
7.6Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
671.0Bparameters
7.6B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
671.0B
DeepSeek R1 Zero

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

MIT

Open weights

DeepSeek R1 Zero

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2025-01-20.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and DeepSeek R1 Zero side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B vs DeepSeek R1 Zero.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B or DeepSeek R1 Zero?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and DeepSeek R1 Zero are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 8.9 and 16.2. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B is made by DeepSeek and DeepSeek R1 Zero is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B compare to DeepSeek R1 Zero in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B scores MATH-500: 92.8%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 49.1%, LiveCodeBench: 37.6%. DeepSeek R1 Zero scores MATH-500: 95.9%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and DeepSeek R1 Zero?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (8.9 vs 16.2). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.