The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B leads the LLM Stats Score 8.5 to -0.6.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 8.5 to -0.6, ranking #266 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 8.5 and ranks #266 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.07/M input and $0.30/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
8.5
#266
-0.6
#319
8.8
#255
-0.3
#308
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.07 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.30 / M
Context window
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
14.1#213
2.7#284
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B · 13 for Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

1 shared

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

380.0M diff

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has 0.4B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B, making it 5.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
7.6Bparameters
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
8.0Bparameters
7.6B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
8.0B
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B does not.

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B is licensed under MIT, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

MIT

Open weights

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B was released on 2025-01-20, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B is 10 months newer than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

10mo newer
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Mar 15, 2024

2.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B's cutoff date.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B

Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B

Oct 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B
✓ Preferred
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B or Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B leads the LLM Stats Score 8.5 to -0.6. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B is made by DeepSeek and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B compare to Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B scores MATH-500: 92.8%, AIME 2024: 83.3%, GPQA: 49.1%, LiveCodeBench: 37.6%. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B scores XSTest: 92.6%, FLEURS: 86.4%, Natural2Code: 75.5%, WMT23: 72.6%, Video-MME: 66.2%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (8.5 vs -0.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 7B is developed by DeepSeek and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is developed by Google.