Model Comparison

DeepSeek-R1 vs Granite 3.3 8B Base

Comparing DeepSeek-R1 and Granite 3.3 8B Base across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-R1 and Granite 3.3 8B Base don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

662.8B diff

DeepSeek-R1 has 662.8B more parameters than Granite 3.3 8B Base, making it 8113.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
671.0Bparameters
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
8.2Bparameters
671.0B
DeepSeek-R1
8.2B
Granite 3.3 8B Base

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-R1 specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only DeepSeek-R1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue May 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Granite 3.3 8B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-R1 does not.

Granite 3.3 8B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-R1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-R1 is licensed under MIT, while Granite 3.3 8B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-R1

MIT

Open weights

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-R1 was released on 2025-01-20, while Granite 3.3 8B Base was released on 2025-04-16.

Granite 3.3 8B Base is 3 months newer than DeepSeek-R1.

DeepSeek-R1

Jan 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 16, 2025

1.1 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Granite 3.3 8B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-04-01, while DeepSeek-R1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Granite 3.3 8B Base's training data extends to 2024-04-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-R1's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-R1

Granite 3.3 8B Base

Apr 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
IBM
Granite 3.3 8B Base

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-R1 vs Granite 3.3 8B Base.

Which is better, DeepSeek-R1 or Granite 3.3 8B Base?

DeepSeek-R1 (DeepSeek) and Granite 3.3 8B Base (IBM) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek-R1 compare to Granite 3.3 8B Base in benchmarks?

Granite 3.3 8B Base scores HumanEval: 89.7%, AttaQ: 88.5%, HumanEval+: 86.1%, AIME 2024: 81.2%, HellaSwag: 80.1%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-R1 and Granite 3.3 8B Base?

DeepSeek-R1 supports 131K tokens and Granite 3.3 8B Base supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-R1 and Granite 3.3 8B Base?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-R1 and Granite 3.3 8B Base?

DeepSeek-R1 is developed by DeepSeek and Granite 3.3 8B Base is developed by IBM.