DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs Ling 3.1 Flash
Ling 3.1 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 13.4.
DeepSeek · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Ling 3.1 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 13.4, ranking #15 overall.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek-V3 0324
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Ling 3.1 Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
5 reported for DeepSeek-V3 0324 · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash
DeepSeek-V3 0324 and Ling 3.1 Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
DeepSeek-V3 0324 has 111.0B more parameters than Ling 3.1 Flash, making it 19.8% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only DeepSeek-V3 0324 specifies input context (163,840 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V3 0324 specifies output context (163,840 tokens).
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V3 0324 was released on 2025-03-25, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.
Ling 3.1 Flash is 18 months newer than DeepSeek-V3 0324.
Mar 25, 2025
1.5 years ago
Sep 30, 2026
1 weeks ago
1.5yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3 0324 and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs Ling 3.1 Flash.