DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs LongCat-2.5
LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 12.8. DeepSeek-V3 0324 is 1.3x cheaper per token.
DeepSeek · Meituan · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
LongCat-2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 12.8, ranking #20 overall.
On price, DeepSeek-V3 0324 is roughly 1.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
LongCat-2.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek-V3 0324
- cost matters — it's about 1.3x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose LongCat-2.5
- overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #20 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
5 reported for DeepSeek-V3 0324 · 23 for LongCat-2.5
DeepSeek-V3 0324 and LongCat-2.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 0324 ($0.24/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 0324 ($0.90/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, LongCat-2.5 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3 0324.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
LongCat-2.5 has 929.0B more parameters than DeepSeek-V3 0324, making it 138.5% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
LongCat-2.5 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3 0324's 163,840 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 0324 can generate longer responses up to 163,840 tokens, while LongCat-2.5 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
LongCat-2.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3 0324 does not.
LongCat-2.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
DeepSeek-V3 0324
LongCat-2.5
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V3 0324 was released on 2025-03-25, while LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01.
LongCat-2.5 is 20 months newer than DeepSeek-V3 0324.
Mar 25, 2025
1.6 years ago
Nov 1, 2026
0 days ago
1.6yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V3 0324 is available from DeepInfra, Novita. LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan.
DeepSeek-V3 0324
LongCat-2.5
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3 0324 and LongCat-2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 0324 vs LongCat-2.5.