DeepSeek-V3 vs Gemma 4 E4B
DeepSeek-V3 and Gemma 4 E4B are closely matched at 15.6 and 13.8 on the LLM Stats Score. Gemma 4 E4B is 10.6x cheaper per token.
DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
DeepSeek-V3 and Gemma 4 E4B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 15.6 and 13.8.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V3 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Gemma 4 E4B is roughly 10.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek-V3
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
Choose Gemma 4 E4B
- cost matters — it's about 10.6x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
20 reported for DeepSeek-V3 · 11 for Gemma 4 E4B
DeepSeek-V3 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Gemma 4 E4B is better at 0 benchmarks.
DeepSeek-V3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($0.27/1M tokens) is 13.5x more expensive than Gemma 4 E4B ($0.02/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($0.89/1M tokens) is 8.9x more expensive than Gemma 4 E4B ($0.10/1M tokens).
In conclusion, DeepSeek-V3 is more expensive than Gemma 4 E4B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
DeepSeek-V3 has 663.0B more parameters than Gemma 4 E4B, making it 8287.5% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemma 4 E4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3 does not.
Gemma 4 E4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
DeepSeek-V3
Gemma 4 E4B
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek-V3 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while Gemma 4 E4B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V3 was released on 2024-12-25, while Gemma 4 E4B was released on 2026-04-02.
Gemma 4 E4B is 15 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.
Dec 25, 2024
1.8 years ago
Apr 2, 2026
6 months ago
1.3yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemma 4 E4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while DeepSeek-V3's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemma 4 E4B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3's cutoff date.
—
Jan 2025
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V3 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra. Gemma 4 E4B is available from DeepInfra.
DeepSeek-V3
Gemma 4 E4B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3 and Gemma 4 E4B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 vs Gemma 4 E4B.