The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V3 vs GPT-6 Cyber

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 14.9. DeepSeek-V3 is 94.1x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 14.9, ranking #77 overall.

On price, DeepSeek-V3 is roughly 94.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Cyber also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V3

  • cost matters — it's about 94.1x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 41.0 and ranks #77 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
GPT-6 Cyber
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
14.9
#271
41.0
#77
Coding
5.8
#228
33.5
#49
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.27 / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
$0.89 / M
$100.00 / M
Context window
131,072
1,050,000

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for DeepSeek-V3 · 1 for GPT-6 Cyber

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V3 and GPT-6 Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($0.27/1M tokens) is 74.1x cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3 ($0.89/1M tokens) is 112.4x cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber ($100.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Cyber is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Nov 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Input tokens$0.27
Output tokens$0.89
Best providerDeepSeek
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$100.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Cyber accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-6 Cyber is limited to 128,000 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Sun Nov 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-6 Cyber supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3 does not.

GPT-6 Cyber can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3 is licensed under MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed), while GPT-6 Cyber uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

GPT-6 Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3 was released on 2024-12-25, while GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05.

GPT-6 Cyber is 23 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.

DeepSeek-V3

Dec 25, 2024

1.9 years ago

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

3 days ago

1.9yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra. GPT-6 Cyber is available from OpenAI.

DeepSeek-V3

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.10/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M

GPT-6 Cyber

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $100.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3 and GPT-6 Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V3
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3 vs GPT-6 Cyber.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3 or GPT-6 Cyber?

GPT-6 Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 41.0 to 14.9. DeepSeek-V3 is made by DeepSeek and GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V3 compare to GPT-6 Cyber in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3 scores DROP: 91.6%, CLUEWSC: 90.9%, MATH-500: 90.2%, MMLU-Redux: 89.1%, MMLU: 88.5%. GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%.

Is DeepSeek-V3 cheaper than GPT-6 Cyber?

DeepSeek-V3 is 74.1x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3 costs $0.27/M input and $0.89/M output via deepseek. GPT-6 Cyber costs $20.00/M input and $100.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3 and GPT-6 Cyber?

DeepSeek-V3 supports 131K tokens and GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3 and GPT-6 Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (14.9 vs 41.0), context window (131K vs 1.1M), input pricing ($0.27 vs $20.00/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed) vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3 and GPT-6 Cyber?

DeepSeek-V3 is developed by DeepSeek and GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons