The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

GPT-6 Cyber vs LongCat-2.5

GPT-6 Cyber and LongCat-2.5 are closely matched at 41.0 and 49.9 on the LLM Stats Score. LongCat-2.5 is 76.2x cheaper per token.

OpenAI · Meituan · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

GPT-6 Cyber and LongCat-2.5 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 41.0 and 49.9.

On price, LongCat-2.5 is roughly 76.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

GPT-6 Cyber also accepts a larger context window (1,050,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose GPT-6 Cyber

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,050,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose LongCat-2.5

  • cost matters — it's about 76.2x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

GPT-6 Cyber
OpenAI
LongCat-2.5
Meituan
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
41.0
#77
49.9
#20
Coding
33.5
#49
38.5
#27
Agents
31.3
#46
36.2
#23
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$20.00 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$100.00 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,050,000
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for GPT-6 Cyber · 23 for LongCat-2.5

No common benchmarks found

GPT-6 Cyber and LongCat-2.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

LongCat-2.5 costs less

For input processing, GPT-6 Cyber ($20.00/1M tokens) is 66.7x more expensive than LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, GPT-6 Cyber ($100.00/1M tokens) is 83.3x more expensive than LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Cyber is more expensive than LongCat-2.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Nov 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$100.00
Best providerOpenAI
Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMeituan
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

GPT-6 Cyber accepts 1,050,000 input tokens compared to LongCat-2.5's 1,048,576 tokens. LongCat-2.5 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while GPT-6 Cyber is limited to 128,000 tokens.

OpenAI
GPT-6 Cyber
Input1,050,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Nov 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both GPT-6 Cyber and LongCat-2.5 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

GPT-6 Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

LongCat-2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

GPT-6 Cyber was released on 2026-11-05, while LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01.

GPT-6 Cyber is 0 month newer than LongCat-2.5.

GPT-6 Cyber

Nov 5, 2026

3 days ago

4d newer
LongCat-2.5

Nov 1, 2026

1 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

GPT-6 Cyber is available from OpenAI. LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan.

GPT-6 Cyber

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $100.00/1M

LongCat-2.5

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against GPT-6 Cyber and LongCat-2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

GPT-6 Cyber
✓ Preferred
LongCat-2.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about GPT-6 Cyber vs LongCat-2.5.

Which is better, GPT-6 Cyber or LongCat-2.5?

GPT-6 Cyber and LongCat-2.5 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 41.0 and 49.9. GPT-6 Cyber is made by OpenAI and LongCat-2.5 is made by Meituan. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does GPT-6 Cyber compare to LongCat-2.5 in benchmarks?

GPT-6 Cyber scores ExploitGym: 48.5%. LongCat-2.5 scores MathVision: 96.5%, BrowseComp: 91.9%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.4%, Video-MME: 85.2%.

Is GPT-6 Cyber cheaper than LongCat-2.5?

LongCat-2.5 is 66.7x cheaper for input tokens. GPT-6 Cyber costs $20.00/M input and $100.00/M output via openai. LongCat-2.5 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via meituan.

What are the context window sizes for GPT-6 Cyber and LongCat-2.5?

GPT-6 Cyber supports 1.1M tokens and LongCat-2.5 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between GPT-6 Cyber and LongCat-2.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (41.0 vs 49.9), context window (1.1M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($20.00 vs $0.30/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes GPT-6 Cyber and LongCat-2.5?

GPT-6 Cyber is developed by OpenAI and LongCat-2.5 is developed by Meituan.

Related comparisons