The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs EXAONE 4.5 33B

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and EXAONE 4.5 33B are closely matched at 28.2 and 26.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · LG AI Research · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and EXAONE 4.5 33B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 28.2 and 26.0.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, EXAONE 4.5 33B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose EXAONE 4.5 33B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
28.2
#134
26.0
#152
28.1
#130
26.6
#145
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
$0.27 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.41 / M
— / M
Context window
163,840

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
EXAONE 4.5 33B
26.3#103
28.4#93
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp · 15 for EXAONE 4.5 33B

3 shared

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU-Pro), while EXAONE 4.5 33B is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA).

EXAONE 4.5 33B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

652.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 652.0B more parameters than EXAONE 4.5 33B, making it 1975.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
685.0Bparameters
LG AI Research
EXAONE 4.5 33B
33.0Bparameters
685.0B
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
33.0B
EXAONE 4.5 33B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp specifies input context (163,840 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
Input163,840 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
LG AI Research
EXAONE 4.5 33B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

EXAONE 4.5 33B supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp does not.

EXAONE 4.5 33B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Text
Images
Audio
Video

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is licensed under MIT, while EXAONE 4.5 33B uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

MIT

Open weights

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp was released on 2025-09-29, while EXAONE 4.5 33B was released on 2026-04-09.

EXAONE 4.5 33B is 6 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

Sep 29, 2025

11 months ago

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Apr 9, 2026

5 months ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

EXAONE 4.5 33B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-01, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm EXAONE 4.5 33B's training data extends to 2024-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Dec 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and EXAONE 4.5 33B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp
✓ Preferred
EXAONE 4.5 33B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs EXAONE 4.5 33B.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or EXAONE 4.5 33B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and EXAONE 4.5 33B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 28.2 and 26.0. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is made by DeepSeek and EXAONE 4.5 33B is made by LG AI Research. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp compare to EXAONE 4.5 33B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores SimpleQA: 97.1%, AIME 2025: 89.3%, MMLU-Pro: 85.0%, HMMT 2025: 83.6%, GPQA: 79.9%. EXAONE 4.5 33B scores AIME 2025: 92.9%, AIME 2026: 92.6%, IFEval: 89.6%, AI2D: 89.0%, MathVista-Mini: 85.0%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and EXAONE 4.5 33B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp supports 164K tokens and EXAONE 4.5 33B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and EXAONE 4.5 33B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (28.2 vs 26.0), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and EXAONE 4.5 33B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is developed by DeepSeek and EXAONE 4.5 33B is developed by LG AI Research.