The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs EXAONE 4.5 33B

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 26.0.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · LG AI Research · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 26.0, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose EXAONE 4.5 33B

  • you are already invested in the LG AI Research ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
EXAONE 4.5 33B
LG AI Research
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
26.0
#152
Reasoning
50.5
#12
26.6
#145
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Atria Dawn Preview
EXAONE 4.5 33B
Tool use
31.1#12
10.6#123
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 15 for EXAONE 4.5 33B

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and EXAONE 4.5 33Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

711.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 711.0B more parameters than EXAONE 4.5 33B, making it 2154.5% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
LG AI Research
EXAONE 4.5 33B
33.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
33.0B
EXAONE 4.5 33B

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

EXAONE 4.5 33B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Atria Dawn Preview does not.

EXAONE 4.5 33B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Atria Dawn Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while EXAONE 4.5 33B uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while EXAONE 4.5 33B was released on 2026-04-09.

Atria Dawn Preview is 5 months newer than EXAONE 4.5 33B.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 weeks ago

5mo newer
EXAONE 4.5 33B

Apr 9, 2026

5 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

EXAONE 4.5 33B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-01, while Atria Dawn Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm EXAONE 4.5 33B's training data extends to 2024-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Atria Dawn Preview's cutoff date.

Atria Dawn Preview

—

EXAONE 4.5 33B

Dec 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and EXAONE 4.5 33B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
EXAONE 4.5 33B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs EXAONE 4.5 33B.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or EXAONE 4.5 33B?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 26.0. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and EXAONE 4.5 33B is made by LG AI Research. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to EXAONE 4.5 33B in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. EXAONE 4.5 33B scores AIME 2025: 92.9%, AIME 2026: 92.6%, IFEval: 89.6%, AI2D: 89.0%, MathVista-Mini: 85.0%.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and EXAONE 4.5 33B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 26.0), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and EXAONE 4.5 33B?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and EXAONE 4.5 33B is developed by LG AI Research.

Related comparisons