The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Gemma 3 4B

Comparing DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemma 3 4B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemma 3 4B trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Gemma 3 4B is roughly 12.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2025

Choose Gemma 3 4B

  • cost matters — it's about 12.6x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.28 / M
$0.02 / M
Output price
$0.42 / M
$0.04 / M
Context window
131,072
131,072
Released
Dec 2025
Mar 2025
License
MIT
Gemma

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemma 3 4Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 4B costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale ($0.28/1M tokens) is 14.0x more expensive than Gemma 3 4B ($0.02/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale ($0.42/1M tokens) is 10.5x more expensive than Gemma 3 4B ($0.04/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is more expensive than Gemma 3 4B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Input tokens$0.28
Output tokens$0.42
Best providerDeepSeek
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input tokens$0.02
Output tokens$0.04
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

681.0B diff

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 681.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 4B, making it 17025.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
685.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3 4B
4.0Bparameters
685.0B
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
4.0B
Gemma 3 4B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Google
Gemma 3 4B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemma 3 4B supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale does not.

Gemma 3 4B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3 4B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is licensed under MIT, while Gemma 3 4B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

MIT

Open weights

Gemma 3 4B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale was released on 2025-12-01, while Gemma 3 4B was released on 2025-03-12.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is 9 months newer than Gemma 3 4B.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Dec 1, 2025

8 months ago

8mo newer
Gemma 3 4B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3 4B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3 4B's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

Gemma 3 4B

Aug 2024

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is available from DeepSeek. Gemma 3 4B is available from DeepInfra.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.28/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.42/1M

Gemma 3 4B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.02/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.04/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemma 3 4B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3 4B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Gemma 3 4B.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Gemma 3 4B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale (DeepSeek) and Gemma 3 4B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale compare to Gemma 3 4B in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores HMMT 2025: 99.2%, AIME 2025: 96.0%, CodeForces: 90.0%, t2-bench: 80.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 73.1%. Gemma 3 4B scores IFEval: 90.2%, GSM8k: 89.2%, DocVQA: 75.8%, MATH: 75.6%, AI2D: 74.8%.

Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale cheaper than Gemma 3 4B?

Gemma 3 4B is 14.0x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale costs $0.28/M input and $0.42/M output via deepseek. Gemma 3 4B costs $0.02/M input and $0.04/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemma 3 4B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale supports 131K tokens and Gemma 3 4B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemma 3 4B?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.28 vs $0.02/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Gemma 3 4B?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is developed by DeepSeek and Gemma 3 4B is developed by Google.