DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Grok-4
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.7 to 33.7. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is 66.7x cheaper per token.
DeepSeek · xAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.7 to 33.7, ranking #35 overall.
On price, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is roughly 66.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
- overall performance matters — it scores 44.7 and ranks #35 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 66.7x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Grok-4
- you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
9 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 · 7 for Grok-4
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Grok-4don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 ($0.06/1M tokens) is 50.0x cheaper than Grok-4 ($3.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 ($0.18/1M tokens) is 83.3x cheaper than Grok-4 ($15.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Grok-4 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Grok-4's 256,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Grok-4 is limited to 8,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Grok-4 supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 does not.
Grok-4 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Grok-4
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is licensed under MIT, while Grok-4 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 was released on 2026-07-31, while Grok-4 was released on 2025-07-09.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is 13 months newer than Grok-4.
Jul 31, 2026
1 months ago
1.1yr newerJul 9, 2025
1.2 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Grok-4's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731's cutoff date.
—
Dec 2024
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks. Grok-4 is available from xAI.
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Grok-4
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Grok-4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Grok-4.