The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 29.9.

DeepSeek · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 29.9, ranking #55 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.0 and ranks #55 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
43.0
#55
29.9
#142
40.9
#62
29.2
#143
30.6
#57
14.8
#151
28.9
#51
12.4
#124
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.06 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
23.0#47
5.6#168
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

1 shared

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

230.0B diff

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 has 230.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 310.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
304.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
74.0Bparameters
304.0B
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
74.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 was released on 2026-07-31, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 3 months newer than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

Jul 31, 2026

2 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

—

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

May 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 29.9. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is made by DeepSeek and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 compare to Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.7%, CyberGym: 76.7%, Toolathlon: 70.3%, DSBench-FullStack: 68.7%, DSBench-Hard: 59.6%. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) scores PinchBench: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, BrowseComp: 66.8%, AA-LCR: 64.1%, MCP Atlas: 52.2%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.0 vs 29.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is developed by DeepSeek and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is developed by NVIDIA.