The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 22.1.

DeepSeek · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 22.1, ranking #55 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.0 and ranks #55 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
DeepSeek
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.0
#55
22.1
#202
Reasoning
40.9
#62
19.8
#213
Coding
30.6
#57
2.9
#241
Agents
28.9
#51
-0.7
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.06 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.18 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Tool use
23.0#47
-2.1#205
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

1 shared

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

300.0B diff

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 has 300.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 7500.0% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
304.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
304.0B
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 was released on 2026-07-31, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 3 months newer than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731

Jul 31, 2026

2 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.0 to 22.1. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is made by DeepSeek and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.7%, CyberGym: 76.7%, Toolathlon: 70.3%, DSBench-FullStack: 68.7%, DSBench-Hard: 59.6%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.0 vs 22.1), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 is developed by DeepSeek and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons