The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 are closely matched at 44.0 and 51.0 on the LLM Stats Score. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is 1.6x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 44.0 and 51.0.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is roughly 1.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

  • cost matters — it's about 1.6x cheaper per token

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
44.0
#51
51.0
#15
40.6
#64
48.6
#18
32.8
#44
39.1
#15
30.3
#46
38.6
#9
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 4
4 of 4
Input price
$0.22 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$0.66 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
21.9#59
30.9#7
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp · 11 for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

4 shared

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is better at 4 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, AutomationBench, NL2Repo, ZEROBench).

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Oct 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp ($0.22/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp ($0.66/1M tokens) is 1.8x cheaper than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Oct 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
Input tokens$0.22
Output tokens$0.66
Best providerDeepSeek
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerDeepSeek
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 393,216 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Wed Oct 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp was released on 2026-08-21, while DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 was released on 2026-10-17.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is 2 months newer than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

Aug 21, 2026

2 months ago

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

Oct 17, 2026

3 days ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is available from DeepSeek.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.66/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.44/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.32/1M

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 44.0 and 51.0. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is made by DeepSeek and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp compare to DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 83.9%, DSBench-Hard: 63.6%, DeepSWE: 59.3%, NL2Repo: 57.7%, ZEROBench: 35.0%. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 scores BabyVision: 92.5%, Chartography: 83.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 77.0%, NL2Repo: 68.2%, AutomationBench: 60.5%.

Is DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp cheaper than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp costs $0.22/M input and $0.66/M output via deepseek. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via deepseek.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp supports 1.0M tokens and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.0 vs 51.0), input pricing ($0.22 vs $0.30/M), licensing (Unknown vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.