The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber are closely matched at 52.6 and 42.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 52.6 and 42.7.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
DeepSeek
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.6
#8
42.7
#44
Coding
42.2
#9
36.1
#25
Agents
38.6
#8
31.7
#25
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.43 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 · 4 for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

1 shared

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is better at 1 benchmark (CyberGym).

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 specifies output context (393,216 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is licensed under MIT, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

MIT

Open weights

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 was released on 2026-08-13, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 1 month newer than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813

Aug 13, 2026

2 weeks ago

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 or Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 52.6 and 42.7. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is made by DeepSeek and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 compare to Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.9%, CyberGym: 83.3%, Toolathlon: 74.1%, DSBench-FullStack: 71.1%, DSBench-Hard: 67.2%. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.6 vs 42.7), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-0813 is developed by DeepSeek and Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google.

Related comparisons