The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched at 43.0 and 45.8 on the LLM Stats Score. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 9.3x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 43.0 and 45.8.

On price, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is roughly 9.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.30/M input and $2.60/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • your work emphasizes agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 9.3x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
DeepSeek
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.0
#49
45.8
#32
Reasoning
43.1
#44
43.3
#42
Coding
31.7
#46
35.9
#25
Agents
23.6
#64
33.1
#30
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$1.30 / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
$2.60 / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Tool use
21.9#48
25.6#28
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max ($1.30/1M tokens) is 9.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max ($2.60/1M tokens) is 9.3x more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
Input tokens$1.30
Output tokens$2.60
Best providerDeepinfra
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1291.0B diff

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max has 1291.0B more parameters than MiMo-V2.6-Flash, making it 417.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
1.6Tparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
1600.0B
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Only DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

MIT

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max was released on 2026-04-23, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5 months newer than DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

Apr 23, 2026

5 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

1 weeks ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is available from DeepInfra, Novita, DeepSeek, Fireworks, Together. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.60/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $1.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $1.74/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.48/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $1.74/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.48/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.74/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.48/1M

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 43.0 and 45.8. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is made by DeepSeek and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max scores CodeForces: 100.0%, HMMT Feb 26: 95.2%, LiveCodeBench: 93.5%, MathArena Apex: 90.2%, GPQA: 90.1%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

Is DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 9.3x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max costs $1.30/M input and $2.60/M output via deepinfra. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.0 vs 45.8), input pricing ($1.30 vs $0.14/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

DeepSeek-V4-Pro-Max is developed by DeepSeek and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons