The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are closely matched at 45.7 and 40.6 on the LLM Stats Score.

Xiaomi · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 45.7 and 40.6.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Pro wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • you are already invested in the Xiaomi ecosystem

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.7
#29
40.6
#57
Coding
36.6
#21
34.1
#35
Agents
33.3
#25
29.9
#38
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 3 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

3 shared

MiMo-V2.6-Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro is better at 3 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, MiMo Coding Bench, Program Bench).

MiMo-V2.6-Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

711.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 711.0B more parameters than MiMo-V2.6-Flash, making it 230.1% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2026-09-22.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 45.7 and 40.6. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.7 vs 40.6). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons