The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 vs Kimi K3

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K3 are closely matched at 51.0 and 51.8 on the LLM Stats Score. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is 10.9x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K3 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 51.0 and 51.8.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is roughly 10.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 6 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 10.9x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Kimi K3

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.85/M input and $14.25/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
51.0
#15
51.8
#14
48.6
#18
51.1
#9
39.1
#15
39.9
#11
38.6
#9
37.3
#16
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 6
2 of 6
Input price
$0.30 / M
$2.85 / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
$14.25 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
Kimi K3
31.8#67
41.3#11
32.2#26
36.0#10
30.9#7
30.9#6
35.0#14
37.2#6
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 · 31 for Kimi K3

6 shared

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AutomationBench, BabyVision, DeepSWE 1.1, ZEROBench), while Kimi K3 is better at 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, Program Bench).

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 9.5x cheaper than Kimi K3 ($2.85/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 11.9x cheaper than Kimi K3 ($14.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K3 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerDeepSeek
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input tokens$2.85
Output tokens$14.25
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2036.8B diff

Kimi K3 has 2036.8B more parameters than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017, making it 266.9% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
763.2Bparameters
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
2.8Tparameters
763.2B
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
2800.0B
Kimi K3

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Kimi K3 can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is limited to 393,216 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K3 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi K3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is licensed under MIT, while Kimi K3 uses Kimi K3 License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

MIT

Open weights

Kimi K3

Kimi K3 License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 was released on 2026-10-17, while Kimi K3 was released on 2026-07-16.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is 3 months newer than Kimi K3.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

Oct 17, 2026

0 days ago

3mo newer
Kimi K3

Jul 16, 2026

3 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is available from DeepSeek. Kimi K3 is available from DeepInfra, Fireworks, Moonshot AI, Novita, Together.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Kimi K3

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $2.85/1MOutput Price:Output: $14.25/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
✓ Preferred
Kimi K3
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 vs Kimi K3.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 or Kimi K3?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K3 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 51.0 and 51.8. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is made by DeepSeek and Kimi K3 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 compare to Kimi K3 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 scores BabyVision: 92.5%, Chartography: 83.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 77.0%, NL2Repo: 68.2%, AutomationBench: 60.5%. Kimi K3 scores MathVision: 97.8%, DeepSearchQA: 95.0%, GPQA: 93.5%, CharXiv-R: 91.3%, BrowseComp: 91.2%.

Is DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 cheaper than Kimi K3?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is 9.5x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via deepseek. Kimi K3 costs $2.85/M input and $14.25/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K3?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 supports 1.0M tokens and Kimi K3 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K3?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 51.8), input pricing ($0.30 vs $2.85/M), licensing (MIT vs Kimi K3 License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 and Kimi K3?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 is developed by DeepSeek and Kimi K3 is developed by Moonshot AI.