The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 29.9. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 10.4x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 29.9, ranking #12 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is roughly 10.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.8 and ranks #12 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 10.4x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
51.8
#12
29.9
#121
48.9
#17
28.4
#128
44.4
#5
16.7
#123
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.22 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$0.66 / M
$10.00 / M
Context window
1,040,000
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
35.2#43
22.0#142
29.5#31
18.8#76
34.3#13
24.9#50
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 13 for Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

2 shared

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is better at 0 benchmarks.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ($0.22/1M tokens) is 5.7x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ($0.66/1M tokens) is 15.2x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Input tokens$0.22
Output tokens$0.66
Best providerFireworks
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash's 1,040,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is limited to 65,535 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,535 tokens
Fri Sep 11 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash was released on 2026-09-10, while Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 was released on 2025-06-05.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 15 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Sep 10, 2026

0 days ago

1.3yr newer
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jun 5, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is available from Google.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.66/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
✓ Preferred
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 29.9. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is made by DeepSeek and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash compare to Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores CodeForces: 100.0%, GPQA: 90.9%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 90.6%, BabyVision: 89.6%, CyberGym: 88.1%. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 scores Global-MMLU-Lite: 89.2%, AIME 2025: 88.0%, FACTS Grounding: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, VideoMMMU: 83.6%.

Is DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 5.7x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash costs $0.22/M input and $0.66/M output via fireworks. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.8 vs 29.9), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.22 vs $1.25/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is developed by DeepSeek and Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is developed by Google.