The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs GPT-5.3 Chat

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 29.6. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 14.6x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 29.6, ranking #13 overall.

On price, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is roughly 14.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.8 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • cost matters — it's about 14.6x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-5.3 Chat

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.75/M input and $14.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
51.8
#13
29.6
#127
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.22 / M
$1.75 / M
Output price
$0.66 / M
$14.00 / M
Context window
1,040,000
128,000

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 2 for GPT-5.3 Chat

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and GPT-5.3 Chatdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ($0.22/1M tokens) is 8.0x cheaper than GPT-5.3 Chat ($1.75/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ($0.66/1M tokens) is 21.2x cheaper than GPT-5.3 Chat ($14.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-5.3 Chat is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Input tokens$0.22
Output tokens$0.66
Best providerFireworks
OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Chat
Input tokens$1.75
Output tokens$14.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to GPT-5.3 Chat's 128,000 tokens. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while GPT-5.3 Chat is limited to 16,384 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Chat
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and GPT-5.3 Chat support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-5.3 Chat

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is licensed under MIT, while GPT-5.3 Chat uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

MIT

Open weights

GPT-5.3 Chat

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash was released on 2026-09-10, while GPT-5.3 Chat was released on 2026-03-04.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 6 months newer than GPT-5.3 Chat.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Sep 10, 2026

1 weeks ago

6mo newer
GPT-5.3 Chat

Mar 4, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.3 Chat has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-31, while DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.3 Chat's training data extends to 2025-08-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash's cutoff date.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

GPT-5.3 Chat

Aug 2025

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita. GPT-5.3 Chat is available from OpenAI.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.66/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

GPT-5.3 Chat

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $1.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $14.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and GPT-5.3 Chat side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
✓ Preferred
GPT-5.3 Chat
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs GPT-5.3 Chat.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or GPT-5.3 Chat?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to 29.6. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is made by DeepSeek and GPT-5.3 Chat is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash compare to GPT-5.3 Chat in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores CodeForces: 100.0%, GPQA: 90.9%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 90.6%, BabyVision: 89.6%, CyberGym: 88.1%. GPT-5.3 Chat scores HealthBench: 54.1%, HealthBench Hard: 25.9%.

Is DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash cheaper than GPT-5.3 Chat?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 8.0x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash costs $0.22/M input and $0.66/M output via fireworks. GPT-5.3 Chat costs $1.75/M input and $14.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and GPT-5.3 Chat?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and GPT-5.3 Chat supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and GPT-5.3 Chat?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.8 vs 29.6), context window (1.0M vs 128K), input pricing ($0.22 vs $1.75/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and GPT-5.3 Chat?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is developed by DeepSeek and GPT-5.3 Chat is developed by OpenAI.