The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs GPT-5.3 Chat

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.3 to 29.6.

Google · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.3 to 29.6, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.3 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose GPT-5.3 Chat

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.75/M input and $14.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
GPT-5.3 Chat
OpenAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.3
#46
29.6
#125
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$1.75 / M
Output price
— / M
$14.00 / M
Context window
—
128,000

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 2 for GPT-5.3 Chat

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and GPT-5.3 Chatdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GPT-5.3 Chat specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only GPT-5.3 Chat specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
OpenAI
GPT-5.3 Chat
Input128,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Wed Sep 09 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-5.3 Chat supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

GPT-5.3 Chat can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-5.3 Chat

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-5.3 Chat

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while GPT-5.3 Chat was released on 2026-03-04.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 6 months newer than GPT-5.3 Chat.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

6 days ago

6mo newer
GPT-5.3 Chat

Mar 4, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-5.3 Chat has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-08-31, while Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-5.3 Chat's training data extends to 2025-08-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

—

GPT-5.3 Chat

Aug 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and GPT-5.3 Chat side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
GPT-5.3 Chat
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs GPT-5.3 Chat.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or GPT-5.3 Chat?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.3 to 29.6. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and GPT-5.3 Chat is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to GPT-5.3 Chat in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. GPT-5.3 Chat scores HealthBench: 54.1%, HealthBench Hard: 25.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and GPT-5.3 Chat?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and GPT-5.3 Chat supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and GPT-5.3 Chat?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.3 vs 29.6), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and GPT-5.3 Chat?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and GPT-5.3 Chat is developed by OpenAI.

Related comparisons