The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Parse

Comparing DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

DeepSeek · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Parse

  • you are already invested in the Cohere ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.22 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.66 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
8,192

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 1 for Parse

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

760.9B diff

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has 760.9B more parameters than Parse, making it 33082.8% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
763.2Bparameters
Cohere
Parse
2.3Bparameters
763.2B
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
2.3B
Parse

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to Parse's 8,192 tokens. Only DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash specifies output context (393,216 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Cohere
Parse
Input8,192 tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Parse support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Parse

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Parse uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Parse

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash was released on 2026-09-10, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 0 month newer than Parse.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Sep 10, 2026

1 weeks ago

2w newer
Parse

Aug 27, 2026

3 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, DeepSeek, Novita. Parse is available from Azure, Cohere.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.66/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Parse

azure logo
Azure
cohere logo
Cohere
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
✓ Preferred
Parse
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Parse.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Parse?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash (DeepSeek) and Parse (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash compare to Parse in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores CodeForces: 100.0%, GPQA: 90.9%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 90.6%, BabyVision: 89.6%, CyberGym: 88.1%. Parse scores ParseBench: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Parse?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Parse supports 8K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Parse?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 8K), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Parse?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is developed by DeepSeek and Parse is developed by Cohere.