The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Parse

Comparing Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Google · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Parse

  • you are already invested in the Cohere ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Parse
Cohere
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
8,192

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 1 for Parse

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Parse specifies input context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Cohere
Parse
Input8,192 tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Parse supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Parse can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Parse

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Parse

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 0 month newer than Parse.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

0 days ago

6d newer
Parse

Aug 27, 2026

6 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Parse
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Parse.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Parse?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber (Google) and Parse (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Parse in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Parse scores ParseBench: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Parse?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Parse supports 8K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Parse?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Parse?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Parse is developed by Cohere.

Related comparisons