The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to -2.4.

DeepSeek · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.8 to -2.4, ranking #13 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.8 and ranks #13 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

  • you are already invested in the Mistral AI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
DeepSeek
Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.8
#13
-2.4
#338
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.22 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.66 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
—

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 1 for Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

760.2B diff

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has 760.2B more parameters than Shieldstral 1.0 (3B), making it 25340.2% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
763.2Bparameters
Mistral AI
Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)
3.0Bparameters
763.2B
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
3.0B
Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash specifies input context (1,040,000 tokens). Only DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash specifies output context (393,216 tokens).

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
Mistral AI
Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash was released on 2026-09-10, while Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) was released on 2026-08-04.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 1 month newer than Shieldstral 1.0 (3B).

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash

Sep 10, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

Aug 4, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
✓ Preferred
Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B).

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash or Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.8 to -2.4. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is made by DeepSeek and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash compare to Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash scores CodeForces: 100.0%, GPQA: 90.9%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 90.6%, BabyVision: 89.6%, CyberGym: 88.1%. Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) scores XSTest: 94.6%.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.8 vs -2.4), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is developed by DeepSeek and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons