The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to -2.4.

Google · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.3 to -2.4, ranking #55 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.3 and ranks #55 on LLM Stats
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
40.3
#55
-2.4
#338
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 1 for Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) was released on 2026-08-04.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 1 month newer than Shieldstral 1.0 (3B).

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

2 weeks ago

4w newer
Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)

Aug 4, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs Shieldstral 1.0 (3B).

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 40.3 to -2.4. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) scores XSTest: 94.6%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (40.3 vs -2.4), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B)?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Shieldstral 1.0 (3B) is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons